History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hershberger v. Lynch
9 Sadler 91
Pa.
1887
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The complaint in this case is that the defendant’s points were not clearly answered. Those points could not well be answered without some explanation; hence, they were so qualified as to give the jury proper instructions on the law governing the case. The charge as a whole was certainly clear enough, aud by it tbe jury could not have been misled.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hershberger v. Lynch
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 11, 1887
Citation: 9 Sadler 91
Docket Number: No. 124, W. D.
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.