History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herndon v. State
55 S.E. 176
Ga.
1906
Check Treatment
Reok, J.

1. The rulings of the court as to the admission of the testimony which were complained of, and the portions of the charge excepted to, were not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the judgment' of the court in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Herndon v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 17, 1906
Citation: 55 S.E. 176
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.