Hernandez v. Taub
796 N.Y.S.2d 169
N.Y. App. Div.
2005
Check Treatment

Nahum Bladimir Hernandez, Appellant, v Christy D. Taub, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department

796 N.Y.S.2d 169

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated July 1, 2004, which granted the defendant‘s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff‘s hospital emergency room records, and the affirmed medical reports of the defendant‘s examining neurologist and orthopedist indicating that the plaintiff had completely recovered from his injuries and was neither impaired nor disabled, as well as the affirmation of a radiologist indicating that MRIs of the plaintiff‘s spine had shown only degenerative conditions, sufficiently established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see ; ). The plaintiff‘s opposition consisted, inter alia, of computerized range of motion and sensory nerve conduction testing, unaffirmed medical reports which were without probative value (see ; ), and the affidavit of a chiropractor which failed to explain a 2 1/2-year gap in treatment (see ; ). Moreover, the mere claim of a disc herniation, without more, is insufficient to show the existence of a serious injury (see ; ). Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and the defendant‘s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted.

Krausman, J.P., Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.