Hernandez v. State
457 So. 2d 1155
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We disagree with the appellant’s two contentions.

There was sufficient evidence to support the order of the trial judge finding that the appellant violated conditions of his probation. Furthermore, it was proper for the trial judge to depart from the sentencing guidelines using the violation of probation by the appellant as the basis for doing so. *1156Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.