Hermanowski v. HermanowskiHermanowski v. Hermanowski
In a stipulation of settlement which was incorporated but not
One who seeks to modify an existing order of visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing, but must make a showing that there has been a subsequent change of circumstances and that modification is in the subject child‘s best interest (see
Based upon the evidence adduced at the hearing, the Family Court‘s determination that the father should be awarded four consecutive weeks of summer visitation with the subject child, and that the parties should alternate visitation during the winter and spring school recesses, was in the child‘s best interest. We discern no basis in the record to disturb the Family Court‘s determination that the father should be permitted to travel with the child outside of the United States (see Matter of Puran v Murray, 37 AD3d 472 [2007]).
The mother‘s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.