History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hermann v. United States
141 F. 486
S.D.N.Y.
1905
Check Treatment
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question is cloth claimed by the importer to be a manufacture of fur, of which fur is the component of chief value, and dutiable at 35 per cent, ad valorem under Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, par. 450, 30 Stat. 193 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1678]. The Board of General Appraisers, however, assessed the merchandise as articles of wearing apparel under paragraph 370, Schedule K, 30 Stat. 184 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1667], or as fur hats and forms for hats under paragraph 432, Schedule N, 30 Stat. 191 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1675].

Apparently the Board rested its decision chiefly on the ground that the protests were submitted by the importers to be decided on the record, and therefore were to be treated as defaulted. This claim of a default is not pressed on this appeal. An examination of the exhibits, in connection with the testimony taken on behalf of the importers as to the character of the cloth, establishes the fact that the classification contended for by them was correct.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hermann v. United States
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Jun 1, 1905
Citation: 141 F. 486
Docket Number: Nos. 3,524, 3,525, 3,526
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.