History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herman v. State
372 So. 2d 996
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1979
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The State filed a seven-count information charging defendant with possession of various drugs, narcotic paraphernalia and weapons. The case proceeded to trial on an amended information. There was no objection to the amended information or any other motions filed. No motion to suppress the seized evidence consisting of drugs, paraphernalia and weapons was made. At trial there was no evidentiary objection based on an illegal search or seizure. Defendant was convicted on all counts.

Defendant raises seven points on appeal before this court. We affirm. The points regarding admission of evidence are not adequately preserved for review, and all others are without merit.

We have considered the briefs, the record, and the transcript and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgment and sentence is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Herman v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 11, 1979
Citation: 372 So. 2d 996
Docket Number: No. 76-2563
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.