Herbert v. CorbyHerbert v. Corby
Dec 12, 1940
Versions:17 A.2d 541125 N.J.L. 5021940 N.J. LEXIS 368
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, WELLS, JJ. 5.