History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herbert v. Corby
1940 N.J. LEXIS 368
| N.J. | 1940
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, WELLS, JJ. 5. *Page 503

Case Details

Case Name: Herbert v. Corby
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 12, 1940
Citation: 1940 N.J. LEXIS 368
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.