History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herbert Casselmann v. Tug Captain Kelly
322 F.2d 820
5th Cir.
1963
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant brought a libel against the Tug CAPTAIN KELLY alleging that his injury was a result of its unseaworthiness. Specifically, he claimed that a ladder should have been provided for use in transferring to the tow, and that the tug’s crew was shorthanded.

The court below, sitting as judge of the law and trier of the facts, resolved the questions against appellant, finding that the Tug CAPTAIN KELLY was not unseaworthy and that the sole proximate cause of libellant’s injury was his own gross negligence. We find that fact issues were raised and we do not find the court’s findings to be clearly erroneous, nor its conclusions to be incorrect. 1

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Notes

1

. A claim for maintenance and cure was settled by the parties pending consideration by this Court of the appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Herbert Casselmann v. Tug Captain Kelly
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 24, 1963
Citation: 322 F.2d 820
Docket Number: 20085
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.