History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heptinstall v. . Rue
75 N.C. 78
N.C.
1876
Check Treatment

If the action is for the conversion of the bale of cotton, as it seems to be, it is a tort, of which a justice has no jurisdiction. If upon the promise to deliver the bale of cotton, the promise seems to have been without consideration, and therefore void.

The case will be remanded that it may be dismissed, and then the parties may proceed upon the other questions as they may be advised. Plaintiff pay cost of this court.

PER CURIAM. Judgment accordingly.

Cited: Nance v. R. R., 76 N.C. 10.

Case Details

Case Name: Heptinstall v. . Rue
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1876
Citation: 75 N.C. 78
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.