History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hensley v. State
363 So. 2d 352
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1978
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hensley v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 19, 1978
Citation: 363 So. 2d 352
Docket Number: No. 77-1839
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.