midpage

Hensley v. StateHensley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jul 19, 1978
No. 77-1839
Versions:363 So. 2d 352
1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hensley v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 19, 1978
Citations: 363 So. 2d 352; 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781; No. 77-1839
Docket Number: No. 77-1839
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In