Henry v. Mississippi

Respondent’s motions that this Court reinstate the judgment of conviction and retax costs are denied. It is noted that the opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court states: “If this case were again before us, we would reaffirm our former opinion and judgment.” Further proceedings in the cause should be addressed to any new final judgment which may be entered by the Mississippi courts. Cf. United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U. S. 233, 245-246; Campbell v. United States, 365 U. S. 85, 99.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the denial of respondent’s motions.

[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 381 U. S. 908.]

Case Details

Case Name: Henry v. Mississippi

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Jun 12, 1967

Citation: 388 U.S. 901

Docket Number: No. 6

Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS