Henry Consulting, LLC v. the New Orleans City Council
2025-CA-0171
| La. Ct. App. | Aug 15, 2025|
Check Treatment HENRY CONSULTING, LLC * NO. 2025-CA-0171
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL
THE NEW ORLEANS CITY * FOURTH CIRCUIT
COUNCIL
* STATE OF LOUISIANA
*
*
*******
CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH:
RAMELLI JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC. NO. 2025-CA-0172
VERSUS
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, HENRY
CONSULTING, LLC., THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS
JCL LOBRANO, J., CONCURS WITH REASONS
I concur in the result reversing the district court’s December 16, 2024
judgment granting mandamus relief and dismissing the petition for mandamus. The
Mayor improperly pursued contract execution through a mandamus with respect to
the procedure established by Ordinance No. 70-10. Any dispute over the policy or
wisdom of that procedure, at this juncture, is for the legislative and executive
branches to address, not for the judiciary to resolve in a mandamus proceeding. As
I noted in my partial dissent in Orleans Par. Sch. Bd. v. City of New Orleans, 25-
0247 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/19/25), — So.3d ––, 2025 WL 1431290, the interruption of
essential public services due to procedural disputes between branches of local
government underscores the need for clear standards, procedures, and cooperative
implementation. This case likewise illustrates that, in matters involving essential
public services, procedural clarity is important to ensure timely execution of
contracts and maintain public confidence in governmental operations.
1
