16206 | Ga. Ct. App. | Mar 27, 1925
(After -stating the foregoing facts.) Only the first headnote will be discussed. Did the court err in striking the special plea? In Long v. State, 25 Ga. App. 22" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1920-03-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/long-v-state-5612185?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5612185">25 Ga. App. 22 (1) (102 S.E. 359" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1920-03-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/long-v-state-5612185?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5612185">102 S. E. 359), this court (citing 17 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, 738; 23 Cyc. 582; Elliott v. Hipp, 134 Ga. 848, 68 S.E. 736" court="Ga." date_filed="1910-07-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/elliott-v-hipp-5577381?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5577381">68 S. E. 736, 137 Am. St. R. 272, 20 Ann. Cas. 423) held: “Bias or prejudice on the part of a judge does not disqualify him, in the absence of a statutory provision on the subject.” In Luke v. Batts, 11 Ga. App. 783 (3)
Judgment affirmed.