History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heneshoff v. Miller
2 Johns. 295
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1807
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The amendment prayed for does not create a new cause of action. Tea is the substantive cause of action, and the word hyson-skin is merely descriptive. The plaintiff may take his rule; but if he elects to withdraw his plea and confess the action, he will not be entitled to the costs of this motion. .

Rule granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Heneshoff v. Miller
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1807
Citation: 2 Johns. 295
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.