History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henegar v. Spangler
29 Ga. 217
Ga.
1859
Check Treatment
— Lumpkin J.

By the Court.

delivering the opinion.

The common law rule is recognized by the presiding Judge, that ordinarily the law exempts a party from arrest while going to, attending on, and returning from Court. But lie considered that the circumstances of this case were peculiar, and justified a departure from the usual practice. These litigants were citizens of Tennessee 5 they met in Georgia -, each sued out bail process against the other. Henegar succeeded in having Spangler arrested in vacation, and the Judge thought it but just that Spangler might have Henegar ■arrested during the Term, where he was in attendance as a suitor.

However right the thing was ip itself, and I agree with Judge Crook that it was so, still, inasmuch the law, as it stands, makes no such distinction, the exception will have to *219be grafted upon the common law principle, by th.e Legislature and not by the Courts.

We are compelled, therefore, reluctantly to reverse the judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Henegar v. Spangler
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 15, 1859
Citation: 29 Ga. 217
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.