History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hendry v. Hendry
171 P. 1051
Or.
1918
Check Treatment
McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hendry v. Hendry
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 9, 1918
Citation: 171 P. 1051
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.