History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henderson v. . Williams
120 N.C. 339
| N.C. | 1897
|
Check Treatment

The summons was returnable to Fall Term, 1895. At Fall Term, 1896, the plaintiff took a nonsuit, and judgment was entered against him for costs. The defendants had witnesses in attendance and their tickets were taxed against the plaintiff, who, at next term, moved to re-tax the costs and to exclude the defendant's witnesses' cost on the ground that they were not sworn, examined or tendered against the plaintiff. His Honor allowed the motion and directed the clerk accordingly.

This was error. The case was brought for trial at Fall Term, 1896, and the defendant properly had his witnesses present. He had no (341) opportunity to swear, examine or tender his witnesses by reason of the nonsuit. It is where a trial is had and the witnesses are not sworn or tendered that their costs cannot be taxed against the party cast. Loftis v. Baxter, 66 N.C. 340. When such costs are allowed, see Code, secs. 528 and 532.

Error.

Cited: Sitton v. Lumber Co., 135 N.C. 541; Brown v. R. R., 140 N.C. 154;Herring v. R. R., 144 N.C. 210; Chadwick v. Ins. Co., 158 N.C. 382.

Case Details

Case Name: Henderson v. . Williams
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1897
Citation: 120 N.C. 339
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.