History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henderson v. State
7 Ga. App. 810
Ga. Ct. App.
1910
Check Treatment
Hnx, C. J.

1. The grounds added by amendment to the motion for a new trial are not verified or approved, and will not be considered. The endorsement on the amendment that it is “allowed” is not equivalent to an approval ■ or verification of the grounds therein. Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133), and cases cited.

Conviction of larceny from house; from Pierce superior court— Judge Edwards presiding. March 26, 1910. Submitted May 17, Decided June 14, 1910. Walter A. Milton, for plaintiff in error. Joseph H. Thomas, solicitor-general, John W. Bennett, contra.

2. The evidence indicating guilt is exceedingly weak and of slight probative value, hut this court can not hold that the verdict is entirely unsupported, and therefore can not grant another trial on the general grounds. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Henderson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 14, 1910
Citation: 7 Ga. App. 810
Docket Number: 2626
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.