History
  • No items yet
midpage
16 N.Y.3d 886
NY
2011

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Appellants failed to comply with the conditional or *888 der. Therefore, the courts below did not err in striking appellants’ answer.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Case Details

Case Name: Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 10, 2011
Citations: 16 N.Y.3d 886; 948 N.E.2d 923; 924 N.Y.S.2d 317; 146 SSM 11
Docket Number: 146 SSM 11
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 16 N.Y.3d 886