Hemsley v. Marlborough Hotel Co.

63 N.J. Eq. 804 | N.J. | 1902

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed filed in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 164.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredbnburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—None.
midpage