117 F.2d 231 | 5th Cir. | 1941
This is another appeal from a judgment on a verdict, fixing the market value of gas, in a suit for royalty arrearages on gas
Apparently the only substantial difference in the cases is that in the first two the defendants were appellants, in this the plaintiff is, and whereas the plaintiff in those cases was insisting that the jury verdict be upheld, the defendant in this case is so insisting.
Appellant recognizes this situation. In his brief he says: “Your honors will note that this case presents identically the same facts and issues as cases Nos. 9493
Affirmed.
Union Producing Company v. Pardue.
Union Producing Company v. Emma Driskell.