22 Mich. 77 | Mich. | 1870
Lead Opinion
The first named of these causes only was argued, but it was stipulated, that as all the others depended upon the same principles and substantially upon the same state of facts, all should abide the same result.
The first named case was a bill for a partition of certain lands shown to have been for several years, and still to be, in the adverse possession of defendant, claiming it as his own adversely to complainant. The whole title in question was purely legal, to the full and perfect trial of which in ejectment no obstacle existed. Complainant had brought ejectment before filing his bill, and two trials of the eject
The like order must be entered in each of the other causes above entitled in the margin.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent, for the reasons given in Hoffman v. Beard.