History
  • No items yet
midpage
Helwig v. Hosmer
73 Mich. 258
Mich.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Helwig was plaintiff in a suit wherein IReinhold Schroeder was defendant, which was on trial in d;he Wayne circuit court. The parties had put in their ■testimony, and rested, when court adjourned for the day. 'The plaintiff desired to present requests to charge and llave his cause argued before the jury by his attorney, who failed to appear at the adjourned hour, and the court, after waiting 15 minutes, proceeded to charge the jury, who subsequently returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff afterwards made a motion for a new ■trial, insisting that the court could do no more than non-suit the plaintiff, if he failed to proceed with his case after the trial commenced. The court overruled the motion. Plaintiff now asks that mandamus may issue requiring the circuit judge to vacate the verdict, and •allow him a new trial of the case upon such terms as may be reasonable and proper.

Held, that the writ must be granted. The circuit judge, under the circumstances, should have directed a nonsuit. The plaintiff had the right to withdraw his case, or abandon his suit, at any time before taking the verdict of the jury.

Case Details

Case Name: Helwig v. Hosmer
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 16, 1889
Citation: 73 Mich. 258
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.