History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hellman v. Longley
154 Cal. 78
| Cal. | 1908
|
Check Treatment
HENSHAW, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Anaheim Landing, Mining, and Development Company from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The judgment was entered April 14, 1906. The motion for a new trial was denied and the order of denial entered October 18, 1906. Notice of appeal from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial was filed December 18,1906.- The appeal from the judgment, therefore, was taken more than sis months from the date of the entry of the judg*79nient and the appeal from the order denying a new trial was taken sixty-one days after entry of the order.

Upon this condition of the record respondent moves that the appeals be dismissed. No answer is made by the appellant, and, indeed, we see none that could be made; therefore, the court being without jurisdiction to entertain these appeals, it is ordered that they be, and they are, hereby dismissed.

JDorigan, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Hellman v. Longley
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 21, 1908
Citation: 154 Cal. 78
Docket Number: L. A. No. 2041
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.