History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heller Ehrman LLP v. K. Neuman
15-17124
| 9th Cir. | Aug 7, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The Memorandum Disposition filed April 10, 2017 is amended as follows: On page 6, in the last paragraph, change:

Heller’s dissolution foreclosed any further compensation to Neuman, as a shareholder, once the Dissolution Committee decided in September 2008 to stop paying shareholders any further compensation. And, as a shareholder at the time of dissolution, the subordination requirements for shareholder claims under the 2008 Plan of Dissolution and 2010 Plan of Liquidation should be applied.

To:

Heller’s dissolution foreclosed any further compensation to Neuman because, under his Employment Agreement, which continued to govern in this respect, he was no longer “entitled to any compensation *2 or any other monies or property” following “the termination of [the] Agreement” when Heller dissolved.

With this amendment, Judges Bybee and McKeown have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wallace voted to grant the petition for rehearing.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing, filed April 24, 2017, is DENIED.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Heller Ehrman LLP v. K. Neuman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 7, 2017
Docket Number: 15-17124
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.