History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heintz v. Village Realty, Inc.
277 F.2d 161
3rd Cir.
1960
Check Treatment

277 F.2d 161

Joseph J. HEINTZ, Jr., and Pauline Heintz, Appellants
v.
VILLAGE REALTY, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; Gallagher
and McManus, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation; and
Centralia Mining Company, a Pennsylvania
corporation.

No. 13093.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

Argued April 5, 1960.
Decided May 3, 1960.

William E. Taylor, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for appellants.

Arthur J. Sullivan, E. Dickinson Griffenberg, Wilmington, Del. (Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington, Del., Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, Del. on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

In this diversity action plaintiffs sought preliminary and permanent injunctions against defendants constructing a shopping center in Swanwyck, Delaware on the ground that the construction violated certain applicable building restrictions. After the court's refusal to allow a temporary restraint of the construction, both sides moved for summary judgment. In granting the defense motion and denying that of plaintiffs, Chief Judge Wright held that the restrictions urged by appellants were not binding on the land involved. His opinion fully covers the issue and does, we think, soundly and fairly decide it.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed. 177 F.Supp. 491.

Case Details

Case Name: Heintz v. Village Realty, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: May 3, 1960
Citation: 277 F.2d 161
Docket Number: 13093
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.