History
  • No items yet
midpage
6 N.Y.3d 886
NY
2006

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 9, 2006
Citations: 6 N.Y.3d 886; 850 N.E.2d 26; 817 N.Y.S.2d 211; 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1300
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., 6 N.Y.3d 886