History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heilman v. Heilman
583 So. 2d 442
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Consistent with our opinion in Oliveri v. Oliveri, 541 So.2d 174 (Fla.4th DCA 1989), we affirm the order of the trial court. However, we certify the following question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court:

IS THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES REQUIRED BEFORE A CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ISSUE MAY BE REFERRED TO A HEARING OFFICER UNDER RULE 1.491, FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE?
ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Heilman v. Heilman
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 14, 1991
Citation: 583 So. 2d 442
Docket Number: No. 91-1508
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.