Heier v. State
188 Ind. 172 | Ind. | 1919
— Appellant was convicted of a violation of what is commonly known as the “Blind Tiger” Law and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and imprisoned in the county jail for thirty days.
It is his contention that he should have been sentenced
An objection to place of imprisonment should have been presented by a motion to modify the judgment. Hunt v. State (1917), 186 Ind. 644, 117 N. E. 856.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 122 N. E. 578. See 97 Am. St. 371, 16 C. J. 1314.