midpage

Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Jan 2, 1947
Versions:188 Misc. 198
67 N.Y.S.2d 905
1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022
Per Curiam.

Memorandum The demand which is necessary to start the running of the Statute of Limitations must be made within a reasonable time. Here, as matter of law, the action is barred by the statute. •

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and ■votes for affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances present the question of whether demand was made within a reasonable time was one of fact to be determined on trial.

Order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jan 2, 1947
Citations: 188 Misc. 198; 67 N.Y.S.2d 905; 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
Log In