History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc.
477 So. 2d 729
La. Ct. App.
1985
Check Treatment
FORET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned this date in Carroll v. Newtron, Inc., 477 So.2d 719 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), (our docket number 84-73, with which this case is consolidated on appeal), the decision of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Fisher Controls, Inc.; and E.B. Badger & Sons Co., and its successor corporation, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, against plaintiffs, James Kenneth Hedrick, Jr. and all third party plaintiffs, are hereby granted, and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Rosemount, Inc.; Magnetrol International, Inc.; Ronan, Inc.; Moore Products Company; Newtron, Inc.; S.I.P. Engineering, Inc.; and Johnson Controls, Inc. against plaintiffs, James Kenneth Hedrick, Jr. and all third party plaintiffs, are hereby denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action of Lena Diane Bruette Hedrick, as to all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice.

Costs of the trial court and of this appeal shall await final disposition of this matter.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 30, 1985
Citation: 477 So. 2d 729
Docket Number: No. 84-74
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.