History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hecht v. Yarnis
50 N.Y.S.2d 170
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment

The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. (Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N. Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]

Case Details

Case Name: Hecht v. Yarnis
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 28, 1944
Citation: 50 N.Y.S.2d 170
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.