Heath v. MaddockHeath v. Maddock
Nov 16, 1914
Versions:94 A. 21883 N.J. Eq. 68113 Buchanan 6811914 N.J. LEXIS 410
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.
For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.