midpage

Heath v. MaddockHeath v. Maddock

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 16, 1914
Versions:94 A. 218
83 N.J. Eq. 681
13 Buchanan 681
1914 N.J. LEXIS 410
Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Heath v. Maddock
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 16, 1914
Citations: 94 A. 218; 83 N.J. Eq. 681; 13 Buchanan 681; 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In