History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heath v. Maddock
83 N.J. Eq. 681
N.J.
1914
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Heath v. Maddock
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 16, 1914
Citation: 83 N.J. Eq. 681
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.