*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: [*]
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons provided in its order granting summary judgment. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6. [1]
Notes
[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
[1] We are satisfied that the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies under the Sarbanes Oxley Act and thus that the district court had jurisdiction over the matter. See Heaney v. GBS Properties LLC d/b/a Prudential Gardner Real. ,ARB Case No. 05-039, 2005 WL 4888985 (ARB May 19, 2005).