History
  • No items yet
midpage
Healy v. Ratta
53 S. Ct. 522
SCOTUS
1933
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 15.

Case Details

Case Name: Healy v. Ratta
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 20, 1933
Citation: 53 S. Ct. 522
Docket Number: No. 669
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.