History
  • No items yet
midpage
Healy v. Prevost
11 F. Cas. 962
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1879
Check Treatment
BUTLER, District Judge.

Tho plaintiff’s claim, as it appears, from the bill of particulars filed, is for upwards of $1,500. And this is the amount involved in the issue joined with Mr. Prevost It is true that the original defendant in the case has paid $1,375 of this sum into the circuit court But the claim of the plaintiff is not abated thereby. It is not improbable that the issue was intended to be joined on the $215, the remainder of the claim, but it is not so done. We cannot regard Mr. Prevost as voluntarily in the court of common pleas, and not therefore *963•entitled to the benefit of the statute which .he invokes. He was called in by the rule to in-terplead, and although he subsequently assented to the rule being made, absolute, I think he should be regarded as if in under a summons. Rule discharged. »

Case Details

Case Name: Healy v. Prevost
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 4, 1879
Citation: 11 F. Cas. 962
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.