Betty L. Bazemore sued Health Management Associates, Inc. d/b/a East Georgia Regional Medical Center (the Medical Center) for injuries she allegedly sustained when she fell while she was a patient at the Medical Center. Along with its initial responsive pleading denying liability, the Medical Center filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it sought to impose vicarious liability on the Medical Center for the professional negligence of a Medical Center employee, and that Bazemore failed to file an expert affidavit with the complaint as required by OCGA § 9-11-9.1. Pursuant to our grant of аn interlocutory appeal, the Medical Center appeals from the trial court’s denial of the motion. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
*286
When a complaint seeks damages against a licensed health care facility
1
based on a claim that the facility is vicariously liable for the professional malpractice of a health care professional licensed by the State of Georgia and listed in OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (d), the plaintiff is required to file an expert affidavit with the complaint in accordance with the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (a). The failure to file the required affidavit subjects the complaint to dismissal.
MCG Health v. Casey,
Bazemore’s complaint alleged that, while she was a patient at the Medical Center, she fell when “an emрloyee” of the Medical Center “negligently failed to give adequate assistance and supervision to [her] while taking her to the restroom....” In an аmendment to the complaint filed after the Medical Center filed its motion to dismiss, Bazemore alleged that “[t]he [Medical Center] employee failed to exercise ordinary care in assisting [her] in that the employee intentionally shut the restroom door and intentionally left [her] without assistanсe.” The complaint also alleged that Bazemore’s injuries were “the result of the negligence of the [Medical Center], acting through its agents, sеrvants and employees—” The complaint did not identify Bazemore’s medical condition prior to the fall, did not identify the Medical Center employee who took Bazemore to the restroom, and did not state whether or not the employee was a health care professionаl licensed by the State of Georgia and listed in OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (d). Moreover, the allegation in the complaint that the injuries resulted from the negligence of Mediсal Center “agents, servants and employees” left unclear whether Bazemore claimed that her injuries were proximately caused by morе than one Medical Center employee.
Although complaints against professionals may state claims based on ordinary as well as prоfessional negligence, the complaint’s characterization of claims as stating professional or ordinary negligence does not сontrol. Shirley v. Hosp. Auth. of Valdosta/Lowndes County,263 Ga. App. 408 , *287 409-410 (587 SE2d 873 ) (2003). Where the professional’s alleged negligence requires the exercise of professional skill and judgment to comply with a standard оf conduct within the professional’s area of expertise, the action states professional negligence. Holloway[,230 Ga. App. at 372 ]. But where the allegations оf negligence do not involve professional skill and judgment, the action states ordinary negligence. MCG Health[,269 Ga. App. at 128 ]. Whether a complaint alleges ordinary or professional negligence is a question of law for the court. Crisp Regional Nursing & Rehabilitation Center v. Johnson,258 Ga. App. 540 , 542 (574 SE2d 650 ) (2002).
Bardo v. Liss,
Despite the fact that the complaint characterized the claim as based on ordinary negligence, whether the complaint alleged ordinary or professional negligence is a question of law.
Pomerantz v. Atlanta Dermatology & Surgery, P.A.,
Applying this test, we find the allegations of the complaint to be so general and unspecific that Bazemore could produce various evidence in support of the allegations which could state claims that a Medical Center employee committed professional negligence or ordinary negligence. For example, Bazemоre could produce evidence that the Medical Center employee at issue was a licensed health care professionаl under OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (d) •— a medical doctor or nurse — who despite awareness of Bazemore’s medical condition left her without assistance in the restroоm. Based on this evidence, the complaint would allege professional negligence because “the degree
*288
of physical assistance needed by [Bazemore] to prevent a fall in light of [her] medical condition required the exercise of expert medical judgment.”
Bardo,
We will not speculate on other evidence which Bazemore could produce in support of the broad allеgations of the complaint. We hold that, because the complaint can be construed to allege that the Medical Center is vicariоusly liable for the professional negligence of a licensed health care professional listed in subsection (d) of OCGA § 9-11-9.1, and Bazemore failеd to file the expert affidavit required by OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (a), the trial court erred by denying the Medical Center’s motion to dismiss to the extent it sought dismissal of any such claim allеged in the complaint.
Brown v. Tift County Hosp. Auth.,
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Notes
The parties do not dispute that the Medical Center is a licensed health care facility.