(HC) Tushar v. Warden, California City Detention Center(HC) Tushar v. Warden, California City Detention Center
ORDER
Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
- Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file a response to the petition.
- A response may be one of the following:
An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by respondent that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner‘s claims. - A motion to dismiss the petition.
- Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition.
- If respondent files an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a traverse within seven days of the date of service of respondent‘s answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted.
- If respondent moves to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within seven days of the date of service of respondent‘s motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered submitted twenty-one days after the service of the motion or when the reply is filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(l).
- Petitioner‘s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 4, 2026
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notes
1
This rule may be applied to petitions brought under § 2241 . See Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.