(HC) Singh v. Andrews(HC) Singh v. Andrews
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 3)
Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
Petitioner has moved for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 3.) There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958). However, the Criminal Justice Act authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the proceeding for financially eligible persons if “the interests of justice so require.”
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 4, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge