History
  • No items yet
midpage
(HC) Shaw v. Campbell
2:05-cv-01506
E.D. Cal.
Nov 3, 2006
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:05-cv-01506-MCE-GGH Document 44 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 2 STEPHANIE M. ADRAKTAS (No. 215323) Attorney at Law P.O. Box 424015 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone (415) 699-1507 Fax Number (415) 626-5475

Attorney for Petitioner DAVID MARTIN SHAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID MARTIN SHAW, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CIV S-05-1506 MCE GGH

Petitioner,

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND TO EXPAND THE RECORD v.

ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden

Respondent .

On October 19, 2006 this court held a hearing on Petitioner’s Motion for Discovery and to Expand the Record to include certain documents. The court has considered the Petitioners’s Motion, the Respondent’s Opposition to the Motion, the arguments of counsel presented at the hearing, and the record of proceedings in the above captioned action.

The court finds that there is good cause for Petitioner’s motion for discovery of the records of the Respondent’s toxicological analysis of witness S.L.’s blood sample.

The Respondent objects to expansion of the record to include Petitioner’s Exhibits 5, 23 and 24 and does not object to the remaining proposed exhibits. *2 Case 2:05-cv-01506-MCE-GGH Document 44 Filed 11/03/06 Page 2 of 2

Accordingly it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. No later than 30 days after the date of this Order Respondent shall provide to Petitioner a copy of the report recording the results of the California Department of Justice analysis of witness S.L.’s blood sample and all related documents including chain of custody records. Those records shall include:

(A) a copy of supplemental report #6 for Marysville Police

Department case number #9-09-1472;

(B) all documents related to the forensic testing of sample P20-005, including chain of custody records for such samples and for Supplemental Report #6;

2. Petitioners’s motion to expand the record to include proposed exhibits 1- 4 and 6-22 is granted;

3. Petitioner’s motion to expand the record to include proposed exhibits 5, 23, and 24 is denied without prejudice;

4. Petitioner is granted leave to move for an evidentiary hearing or to move to expand the record (by stipulation if available) after petitioner receives discovery and set forth in paragraph 1 of this Order.

DATED: 11/2/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows _________________________________ THE HONORABLE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS MAGISTRATE JUDGE

shaw1506.ord

Case Details

Case Name: (HC) Shaw v. Campbell
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Nov 3, 2006
Docket Number: 2:05-cv-01506
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.