(HC) Rodriguez v. Macomber(HC) Rodriguez v. Macomber
ORDER
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
- Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. See
Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 . An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. SeeRule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 ; - If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;
- If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the
motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter; and - The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the form Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge, and a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General.
Dated: 08/04/26
CHI SOO KIM
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE