History
  • No items yet
midpage
(HC) Prado v. Runnels
2:05-cv-00677
E.D. Cal.
Jun 26, 2006
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Case 2:05-cv-00677-GEB-KJM Document 6 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEJANDRO PRADO,

Petitioner, 2:05-cv-0677-GEB-KJM-P vs.

D.L. RUNNELS,

Respondent. ORDER

/

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 21, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

/////

1 *2 Case 2:05-cv-00677-GEB-KJM Document 6 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 21, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s April 6, 2005 “writ of mandamus” is dismissed.

Dated: June 26, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Case Details

Case Name: (HC) Prado v. Runnels
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Jun 26, 2006
Docket Number: 2:05-cv-00677
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.