70 Ky. 489 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1870
delivered the opinion op the court.
The appellant, Susan E. Hays, by her next friend, filed a petition in the Kenton Circuit Court, alleging substantially
A demurrer admitting these allegations was sustained, and and her petition dismissed.
The correctness of that judgment presents the only question for revision on this appeal.
It seems to this court that the facts thus presented constitute a good cause of action, according to the principles of the common law, which must chiefly govern this case.
The husband’s conveyance of a fee was, under our statutory law, effectual to pass all the title he had, but could pass no more. And his title, resulting altogether from the marriage, ceased with the legal dissolution of that union as certainly and as effectually as it would have terminated by his death. In this respect the divorce was a civil death. Dissolving the marital relation, it restored the liberated wife to her exclusive right to her land, which had not been legally disposed of by the husband beyond the subsistence of the marriage. The incident fell with the principal. Our statutory law provides that a divorce destroys the husband’s potential right to curtesy. And this accords with the principle -which defines his common law interest in the land of his wife; for, though it is loosely said to continue “ during their joint lives,” yet this necessarily means their joint lives as husband and wife. Any other interpretation would absurdly make the incident
Wherefore tbe judgment dismissing ber petition is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.