History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haynie v. State
167 S.E. 612
Ga. Ct. App.
1933
Check Treatment
Broyles, O. J.

Tlie accused was convicted of cheating and swindling, on an accusation drawn under section 706 of the Penal Code, which provides as follows: “If any person shall knomngly [italics ours] buy or sell by false weights or measures, he shall be deemed a common cheat, and shall be punished as for a misdemeanor.” The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that the trial judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury, erred in finding the defendant guilty, and that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Querry, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Haynie v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 25, 1933
Citation: 167 S.E. 612
Docket Number: 22624
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.