History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haynes v. Haynes
279 A.D. 583
N.Y. App. Div.
1951
Check Treatment

The defendant, however, was not entitled to any credit for alimony payments in a larger amount made by him prior to the entry of the order of modification; for that reason we reverse the second order and grant plaintiff’s motion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Haynes v. Haynes
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 30, 1951
Citation: 279 A.D. 583
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.