midpage

Hayes v. StateHayes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 19, 1918
No. 5078.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Davidson
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of the local option law. Without investigating ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‍the case on the facts, it should be dismissed on motion of the Assistant Attorney General based *597 on the insufficiency of the recognizance. It recites that appellant stands ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‍charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, and requires his appearance before the trial court from day to day and from term to ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‍term, and not depart therefrom without leave of that court to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The defect in the recognizance is ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‍that it does not recite, first, that appellant was convicted, and, second, the punishment awarded. The statute requires these matters to be set out in the recognizance. ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‍The motion of the Assistant Attorney General is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hayes v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 19, 1918
Citations: 204 S.W. 330; 83 Tex. Crim. 596; 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 268; No. 5078.
Docket Number: No. 5078.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
Log In