History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hayes v. State
4 Okla. Crim. 377
Okla. Crim. App.
1910
Check Treatment

First. The information, in substance, is in the language of the statute, refers to but one and the same transaction, and charges but one offense. The trial court, therefore, did not err in overruling the demurrer to the information. *Page 378

Second. No exceptions were reserved to the instructions of the court to the jury. We therefore cannot consider the objection now attempted to be made to said instructions. The charge of the court is subject to criticism, but the errors therein contained are not fundamental.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hayes v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Date Published: Nov 23, 1910
Citation: 4 Okla. Crim. 377
Docket Number: No. A-260.
Court Abbreviation: Okla. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.