273 F. 363 | D.D.C. | 1921
This is a trade-mark opposition proceeding, brought under section 6 of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905 (Comp. St. § 9491), and involves the right of appellant Hay to register the words “Hay-Po” as a trade-mark for hair dressing. The following is an illustration of the mark as actually used in trade:
The mark of the opposer, Malone, consists of substantially the same portraits “Before” and “After,” with the word “Poro” printed above, all inclosed within a circle. Opposer has established prior use of her mark.
In a former proceeding, appellant attempted to register the mark above illustrated with the “Before” and “After” features, and was successfully opposed by appellee. On this point, the Commissioner, in his opinion, said:
“An applicant should not be allowed to register one feature of his mark when it discloses other prominent and material features. Such practice would enable an applicant using a compound mark, when rejected on a previous compound mark, to select the feature not shown in the prior mark and register it, and thus evade the rejection, although actually using a mark that infringed the prior mark. This would evidently lead to intolerable results.”
The, decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed.
Affirmed.
M!r. Justice HITZ, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB in the hearing and’ determination of this appeal.