20 Ga. App. 431 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1917
1. In a contractor’s suit against a railroad company, to ■ foreclose a lien for work done in building a portion of the railroad, it was alleged: that under a contract for the grading of a certain section
2. Under the foregoing ruling, there was no error in allowing the recorded claim of lien to be admitted in evidence. Nor would the fact that the cl,aim of lien did not specify the particular portion of the road upon which the work was done, or the date on which the work was completed, render it invalid. Arnold v. Farmers Exchange, 123 Ga. 731 (51 S. E. 754); Ford v. Wilson, 85 Ga. 109 (11 S. E. 559); Broxton Artificial Stone Works v. Jowers, 4 Ga. App. 91 (60 S. E. 1012).
3. Under the particular facts of the case, there was no error in admitting in evidence the transcript of the “force account,” taken from the original books of entry then in existence, where it appeared that the identical memoranda had been submitted to the defendant and the corrections were made and entered by it thereon.
4. The court, in the charge to the jury, fairly submitted to them the question as to whether the plaintiff had transferred to another his contract with the defendant, although it appears that the evidence for the
5. The evidence authorized the verdict; and, there being no material error of law, it will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.